After reading about Charles Lamb last year I decided to invest in this little book in order to acquaint myself with some of Shakespeare's works.

Having read some of Poe's work already I didn't miss the opportunity to buy this Penguin book from a local second-hand shop. I particularly welcome the introduction provided by Professor David Galloway. I'll be reading the rest of this book a little at a time throughout 2017.

A descent into the Maelstrom reminded me of Journey to the Center of the Earth by Juels Verne, since I have been listening to an audio book of it.

Since I’ve owned a 10 volume set of these old encyclopedias since my childhood, but never read them, I thought I would read one volume a year – in 2017 I started volume 5.

I was hearing about the concept that Christ is something within us, and in searching for more information I found this book by Tolstoy... I've been meaning to read something by him.

I chose this book to read as part of Banned Book Week. It took me a little longer than a week to read though... (over a month).

I'd heard about The Protocols mainly from the likes of David Icke and I think it was when I then looked into them that I leaned that they were preceded by 'Dialogue In Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu' by Maurice Joly, which is why I read the Dialogue first. The general consensus is (if you read the Wikipedia page that is) that the Dialogue precedes The Protocols, and this is based on the dates associated with their respective publications, but some others dispute this.

Having now read these documents back to back my impression is that The Protocols precedes the Dialogue. My reasoning for this is admittedly simplistic but it is that it seems the author of the Dialogue took The Protocols and imagined Machiavelli being the voice behind them; the imagined dialogue used to convey 'his' reasoning for them as he explained them to Montesquieu, since the actual Protocols don't have any one person's voice as such, although they are being read out to an audience, the Jews; the Elders of Zion.

The tone of voice I imagined from each document was similar (although perhaps that was my doing) with Machiavelli and the Protocols orator (at first) justifying them because the people they were to be inflicted on (ie everyone else) lacked the brain cells and the wherewithal to behave any "better". I say 'at first' because upon reaching the final few Protocols (there are 24) we reach some reasoning for them beyond a desire to control the masses. That reasoning is that the masses need controlling; there are far too many basic folk who would it seems ruin things for everyone else, certainly the elite of the elite, the Elders as it were.

From this final given explanation I don't condone the chosen method of dealing with the issue it portrays, but I accept it as a method; it seem like accepting politics to keep a system in place that benefits the majority. I would just like to think there are better ways, more loving and compassionate ones; but that would involve everyone pulling together, rather than a Chosen few to pull the strings.

A little 'Pelican Book' from 1958 that found its way into my collection.

A 133 page "pamphlet", 3/5ths "science", 2/5ths recipes. This was one of a number of Kindle/e-books I got for free via Amazon.

If you really want to get your head around how the adrenal glands work then the first part of this book might help, but ultimately if you develop a healthy sleeping routine, a healthy diet (plenty of fruit and vegetables) free from processed food and sugar, caffeine and alcohol, and you get a good amount of exercise and partake in a splash of yoga (whilst minimising excessive stress) you'll be well on your way. Or you can spend an hour reading through this book, which is pretty much how long it took me.

As for the recipes, I find you can modify many recipes for things you might fancy, and make them healthier if they aren't quite so to begin with.

Perhaps the title should be Adrenal Fatigue-free Diet?

Translated by Not Bored. Downloaded to eReader

Notes:

p.15 "Machiavelli: ... In a little while, there will be disorder everywhere: inexhaustible rhetoricians will transform the deliberatory assemblies into oratory jousts; audacious journalists and unbridled pamphleteers will attack the person of the sovereign every day, will discredit the government, the ministers, the men in positions of power. . . .

Montesquieu: I have long known these reproaches that are addressed to free governments. They have no value in my eyes; abuse does not condemn these institutions. I know of many States that have long lived in peace and under such laws: I pity those who cannot.

Machiavelli: Wait: in your calculations, you have only accounted for social minorities. There are gigantic populations riveted to work by poverty, as they were in the past by slavery. What importance do all your parliamentary fictions have to their happiness? In short, your great political movement has only ended in the triumph of a minority privileged by chance, as the ancient nobility triumphed through birth."

Downloaded to eReader

I came across a definition of reality by sci-fi author Philip K. Dick, and found it existed in what was labelled as novel by him 'How to Build a Universe That Doesn't Fall Apart Two Days Later'. The definition states: "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."

Since I had recently acquired an eReader I sourced a copy of the book, but found this 'story' to be more a short article, or reflection on novels, by Dick... by Dick, but on the nature of reality nonetheless. Dick had discovered that one or more of his earlier novels, and random situations in his own life had strange correlations with parts of the Bible, namely the book of Acts. Dick comes to the conclusion that time is an illusion and somewhat cyclical it seems, and that the book of Acts, as his example, outlined a sequence of events that are reoccurring.

Downloaded to eReader

I learned a little about Annie Besant after watching an episode of Young Indiana Jones, or rather the extended features included in the DVD set, and since I had been dabbling in the physical art of yoga, this book, or transcript of a speech given by Besant, seemed like it might be interesting to me. However, it turned out to be nothing about downward-facing-dogs, but quite enlightening indeed.

This is the third book by Josie Dew, where, in this instalment she cycles in Japan. I thoroughly enjoyed the first two but this one weighs in at 690 pages and I feel Josie waffles on a lot in this one without seeming to get anywhere. By the time I'd finished this book and turned to the next I decided enough was enough.

If you like reading books about quantum mechanics, the possibility that we may live in a multiverse or simulation, or ever ponder time travel, this is a great book. Given its topic I found it pretty easy to read - not too much to grapple with compared to others about particle physics -, and thought-provoking.

Travels in a Strange State by Josie Dew

In this, Josie's second instalment, she travels across America. I read the first book of her travels last year (2016).

From this title I read:
 - Religio Medici
 - Hydriotaphia with The Garden of Cyrus
 - Christian Morals

It's a good book to dip into to research particular holidays, but a bit of a slog to read from cover-to-cover.

Another book* that thinks we can fix climate change with a bunch of solutions when the obvious one is to look at population. The problem with trying to technology ourselves out of supposed situations is that they cost us, and with the case of climate change they add to the problem while the solution is sought.

See 'Meat, a benign extravagance' which I read in 2016.

I rarely read/listen to audio books, but since I read 1984 by George Orwell (back in 2014) and I discovered this audio book of the comparable dystopic novel 'We' by Russian author Zamyatin, I let it play. Similar to 1984 is centres the story around a main character and his love interest, or rather, in We, he discovered love and ends up being ruled by his heart; an alien situation for him being a rational-minded chief mechanic of the soon-to-launch Integral, for which his seductress wants to get hold of and bring about a revolution.

Youtube: https://youtu.be/ifWZOSMMeHA

I happened upon the 2003 edition of this book (there is a 2016 version but I don't know what the differences are). I've also read other books, namely Gods of the New Millennium (in 2007), and The Phoenix Solution (in 2008). In this one specifically about the Great Pyramid, I appreciated Alford's thorough examination of the inner layout of the Great Pyramid of Egypt, even if I don't agree with his ideas. I wrote a little more about it here: https://bmhonline.wordpress.com/2017/01/21/handles-in-the-great-pyramid