|
The
purpose of this section is to
collect my views / opinions /
comments / notes on some of the various
videos I watch online (typically
on either Youtube or Rumble), rather than simply
watching and absorbing and
moving on to the next.
|
Disclaimer:
It came to my attention a while
back that
some people are finding their
way here and seemingly taking
offence to some of the content.
I don't seek to offend; at most
I like to share alternative
views and be open to polite
discussion. I rarely take issue
with individuals, rather, I
consider the system that created
them/their/our views/behaviours.
I welcome responses/feedback to
any points I make. |
I
don't always leave comments on
videos directly because:
-
The
video has received a vast number
of comments already and I think
mine will go unnoticed
-
The
youtuber doesn't appear to be
someone who reads/responds to
comments (so why bother?)
-
I
have a lot to say, or more to
say than is relevant
-
This
is my space and have no trouble
finding my way back here, rather
than posting on a video and
forgetting about it
 I
intend my viewing habits to
revolve more around
"thought-provoking" content, but
intend to include some
"entertainment" also, if not
both in one sitting (my comments
are often laced with sarcasm).
If
you happen to watch any of these
videos, or ones on a similar
topic, then you are welcome to
get in touch to share your
views and links.
|
|
|
Facebook Announces END OF CENORSHIP In HUGE Victory,
ADMITS Deep State FORCED
Censorship On META
Timcast
| Date added:
09-January-2025
My response...
Besides Tim appearing to
contradict himself in this
video about how he actually
feels about this and Zuck, I
pretty much agree with
anyone who thinks the man is
a slimy piece of poop.
This isn't coming from the
stance of someone who was
using FB and then got kicked
off it at a particular time
(such as during the big C,
or when the political
narrative was saying this
thing or that), because
while I did sign up to it
over a decade ago, I never
really fully "got into it";
I found a few high school
friends back in the day, and
added one or two people, and
then after a short while I
removed them and moved on. I
logged in for a short while
last year in order to sell a
car, that's it. However, I
can relate when it comes to
being shadowbanned online,
being deplatformed (I was
kicked off Youtube), and
being stalked, shouted down,
and confronted in
shops/supermarkets over my
refusal to "comply" with
certain nonsensical
requests.
I think I was on the right
side during these incidents,
and likewise Zuckerberg
thought he was, but now he
changes tack in order to get
on the new "right side"; in
the clip in the above video
he sucks up to both
"President Trump" and Elon
Musk; that's half of what
he's on about in his speech,
besides trying to both suck
people back in who left, or
appearing to suck further up
to people already on his
platform who believe his
shpeal. Ideally anyone who has
left or been forced away
from such places has found a
better and nicer place, but
if not, they might be lured
back... but surely not only
from that speech.
Zuckerberg speaks highly of
Twitter/X as if that
platform knows what its
doing under the leadership
of Musk whose been at it for
all of 5 minutes (in my
mind), when he himself
should surely know what he's
doing since (he created,
and) he's been
running Facebook for how
long? The truth should
surely be that he knew what
he was doing all along and
it's just that now he finds
he's otherwise on the wrong
side following Trump's win
and get together with Musk
et al.
I'm someone who holds
grudges, not in a "seeking
revenge" kind of way
(although karma can dish out
some bitter justice) but as
someone who finds it hard to
forget or let go of some
past trauma. I don't know if
this is a good thing -
letting bygones be bygones
is one thing, but you do
risk being stepped on and
taken for a mug if you're
not careful.
To anyone returning to a
platform (or other place)
when all that has been
spoken of/promised is words
and nothing has actually
changed, such as a shakeup
of who works there or runs
it, or even presenting an
actual incentive to be
there, is surely a mug (but
perhaps you have your
reasons?) but from reading
comments about this speech
on the likes of Rumble, most
people know they're not
going back.
Zuckerberg seemingly tries
to apologise and hold his
hands up for his systems
making mistakes and being
too strict, but again the
truth is surely that those
systems were working as
intended (for both him and
the people behind him
pulling the strings). The
result was that he has (as
other platforms do) pushed
away and alienated a good
half of his users/audience
and is now suffering the
repercussions - he and his
handlers have no access to
the minds and souls of those
on the other side.
Likewise, while I think it's
a shame my Youtube channel
got taken down, I have seen
firsthand just how easily a
seemingly nice place can turn against
you, giving you a slap in
the face after all the time
and dedication you put into
something (when I was never
even monetised in the first
place). I can't see myself
going back there now - I did
half-heartedly try for a
short while with another
endeavour, but the magic
wasn't there and I prefer to
support and use platforms
and places that either
support me in return, or
don't appear to be on the
verge of turning on me at
any moment... or at the very
least, I tread carefully.
What do you think?
|
Nina - Targeted Individual,
Secret Space Program
Memories - Typical Skeptic
Podcast 1252
Typical Skeptic Podcast
| Date added:
24-June-2024
My response...
The Typical Skeptic Podcast
was, I think, a particular
channel I first discovered
on Rumble after making a
more concerted effort to
view content there rather than over
on the dark
red side. Host of the
platform Robert Kalil does a
nice job of
interviewing/chatting in a
nice way with his guest who
talk about a variety of
topics from alien abductions
to, the spiritual realm, and
a new one for me, the
concept of "targeted
individuals".
This particular podcast with
"Nina Lyn" has been the most
intriguing for me to date. I have
listened to and watched it a
few times now, sometimes
during the night when I
elected to download, convert
and listened to the show as
an MP3 while I dozed off.
As I find with quite a lot
of Robert's guests, many of
then do come across to me as
"quite far out there" to put
it politely, but as Robert
himself expresses in this
video, he likes to treat
guests with respect and
acknowledges their
experiences as that,
regardless of how "genuine"
they might be - we are each
living our own reality. The more I
listened to Nina the more
what she was saying made
sense, from both a "I can
see that as being the case"
and "I see where she's
coming from with that".
One topic covered here, and
there were many, is
regarding the numerous
conspiracy theories
regarding the so-called
illuminati and their
involvement in the music
industry; here Nina explains
things in a way I had not
heard or considered before;
that we are hijacked in
order to enable their
perverse imagery to past
through into the astral
realm. This might sound
far-fetched at first, but if
you believe you have a soul,
and that journeys on into
the next life when you die,
then what experiences we all
have (both
good and bad), can travel
with us to the next life.
With all the crap that's in
this life (although I don't
mean to sound too
pessimistic), this is quite
a concern.
While this particular video
and example of the TSP's
content might be hard to
digest I recommend browsing
through the channel's back catalogue
on Rumble to see if anything
grabs your interest.
What do you think?
|
Tesla Car
GRAVEYARDS In Chicago As
Deep Freeze DRAINS
Batteries, Climate Agenda
Will KILL PEOPLE
Timcast
| Date added:
17-January-2024
My response...
In this video (not
intentionally related to the
previous one), Tesla-fanboy
himself, Tim Pool, defends
Tesla after electric cars
are left stranded without
power during freezing
conditions in Chicago. He
blames the owners for not
knowing that their batteries
will not work in such
conditions, or for failing
to prepare them.
Someone in the comments
section of his upload to
Rumble remarked that the
real issue is with gasoline-powered
cars in the summer in
Arizona, since they often
catch fire due to oil leaks.
This, I pointed out was due
to a lack of maintenance;
here in the UK our vehicles
are subjected to an annual
checkup (MOT) which will
highlight existing oil
leaks. Generally we're not
demanded to rectify such
leaks, supposedly because
they don't pose the same
risk in our cooler summers,
but repairs could simply
mandated in a place like
Arizona where the risk is
greater. This is not the
same as a relatively new car
simply not functioning
because the technology it
runs on can't cope with the
conditions.
That being said, there are
extreme conditions where
things will just not
operate, or will break.
Drive your car through water
that is too deep for it and
it will fail, try and drive
it off road when it is not
built for that, and it will
get stuck. But this Tesla
battery issue is surely a
failure of forethought on
the part of Tesla (other
electric cars surely have
this issue also).
Teslas have an array of
technologies on board, they
can pretty much drive
themselves. Cars for decades
have been able to alert the
driver to ice. That an
operator of such a device
doesn't know the limitations
of their device should be an
assumption of the
manufacturer, or are they
ignorant of these
limitations also?
A Tesla knows the road
ahead; it has maps and can
be informed of roadworks or
diversions ahead. It knows
of the locations of charging
stations, and it can also
know the weather conditions
- all this data is available
on the internet for which it
is connected. Therefore, the
vehicle itself can forecast,
on behalf of the driver,
that weather conditions pose
a risk to the vehicle and
alert the driver
accordingly: "Cold
temperatures present, aim to
keep the battery above 50%
charge, keep the vehicle
running..." etc.
It appears that people were
finding their vehicles
batteries were not holding
charge in these Chicago
conditions, or they were
"running out" sooner than
expected. These people were
then seeking to charge up
their vehicle, and seemingly
switching the vehicle off
during charging, for which
the car could then not
re-activate because the
temperature of the battery
had dropped too low. This
should all be catered for
within the technology of the
car; if coolant can be
circulated through the
batteries to keep the
temperatures within a safe
operating temperature, then
surely they could also be
warmed using a similar
process. Of course this
relies on the batteries
having sufficient charge to
begin with.
Recently an electric car
owner claimed on UK radio
that an electric car could
keep its occupants warm for
two days, but in hindsight
they were failing to account
for diminishing returns from
those batteries in cold (UK)
conditions, or that they
might fail entirely.
Tim casually exclaimed in
his video that he also has a
vehicle with an internal
combustion engine for this
very eventuality. Lucky you.
He also had a garage that he
can keep his Tesla warm in.
Good for you. I wonder how
much this would add to an
energy bill of a regular
home-owner who is tied to
the grid for their energy.
Great if you are Tim and can
not only afford a Tesla, and
another car, and a heated
garage and you have the
level of understanding about
the batteries in your
vehicles. For everyone else,
even the battery in a
petrol/diesel-powered car
can struggle in freezing
conditions, particularly if
that battery is a few years
old. If you notice your car
is sluggish to start during
colder weather then it might
be worth charging that
battery up with a standalone
charger, especially if you
typically only drive short
distances. Also be aware
that your vehicle uses
coolant/anti-freeze and it
might be too concentrated
for extreme cold. Keep a
warm blanket in your vehicle
in case you are left
stranded somewhere.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
